Floquet Formalism¶
Introduction¶
Many time-dependent problems of interest are periodic. The dynamics of such systems can be solved for directly by numerical integration of the Schrödinger or Master equation, using the time-dependent Hamiltonian. But they can also be transformed into time-independent problems using the Floquet formalism. Time-independent problems can be solve much more efficiently, so such a transformation is often very desirable.
In the standard derivations of the Lindblad and Bloch-Redfield master equations the Hamiltonian describing the system under consideration is assumed to be time independent. Thus, strictly speaking, the standard forms of these master equation formalisms should not blindly be applied to system with time-dependent Hamiltonians. However, in many relevant cases, in particular for weak driving, the standard master equations still turns out to be useful for many time-dependent problems. But a more rigorous approach would be to rederive the master equation taking the time-dependent nature of the Hamiltonian into account from the start. The Floquet-Markov Master equation is one such a formalism, with important applications for strongly driven systems (see e.g., [Gri98]).
Here we give an overview of how the Floquet and Floquet-Markov formalisms can be used for solving time-dependent problems in QuTiP. To introduce the terminology and naming conventions used in QuTiP we first give a brief summary of quantum Floquet theory.
Floquet theory for unitary evolution¶
The Schrödinger equation with a time-dependent Hamiltonian \(H(t)\) is
where \(\Psi(t)\) is the wave function solution. Here we are interested in problems with periodic time-dependence, i.e., the Hamiltonian satisfies \(H(t) = H(t+T)\) where \(T\) is the period. According to the Floquet theorem, there exist solutions to (1) on the form
where \(\Psi_\alpha(t)\) are the Floquet states (i.e., the set of wave function solutions to the Schrödinger equation), \(\Phi_\alpha(t)=\Phi_\alpha(t+T)\) are the periodic Floquet modes, and \(\epsilon_\alpha\) are the quasienergy levels. The quasienergy levels are constants in time, but only uniquely defined up to multiples of \(2\pi/T\) (i.e., unique value in the interval \([0, 2\pi/T]\)).
If we know the Floquet modes (for \(t \in [0,T]\)) and the quasienergies for a particular \(H(t)\), we can easily decompose any initial wavefunction \(\Psi(t=0)\) in the Floquet states and immediately obtain the solution for arbitrary \(t\)
where the coefficients \(c_\alpha\) are determined by the initial wavefunction \(\Psi(0) = \sum_\alpha c_\alpha \Psi_\alpha(0)\).
This formalism is useful for finding \(\Psi(t)\) for a given \(H(t)\) only if we can obtain the Floquet modes \(\Phi_a(t)\) and quasienergies \(\epsilon_\alpha\) more easily than directly solving (1). By substituting (2) into the Schrödinger equation (1) we obtain an eigenvalue equation for the Floquet modes and quasienergies
where \(\mathcal{H}(t) = H(t) - i\hbar\partial_t\). This eigenvalue problem could be solved analytically or numerically, but in QuTiP we use an alternative approach for numerically finding the Floquet states and quasienergies [see e.g. Creffield et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 165301 (2003)]. Consider the propagator for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (1), which by definition satisfies
Inserting the Floquet states from (2) into this expression results in
or, since \(\Phi_\alpha(T+t)=\Phi_\alpha(t)\),
which shows that the Floquet modes are eigenstates of the one-period propagator. We can therefore find the Floquet modes and quasienergies \(\epsilon_\alpha = -\hbar\arg(\eta_\alpha)/T\) by numerically calculating \(U(T+t,t)\) and diagonalizing it. In particular this method is useful to find \(\Phi_\alpha(0)\) by calculating and diagonalize \(U(T,0)\).
The Floquet modes at arbitrary time \(t\) can then be found by propagating \(\Phi_\alpha(0)\) to \(\Phi_\alpha(t)\) using the wave function propagator \(U(t,0)\Psi_\alpha(0) = \Psi_\alpha(t)\), which for the Floquet modes yields
so that \(\Phi_\alpha(t) = \exp(i\epsilon_\alpha t/\hbar) U(t,0)\Phi_\alpha(0)\). Since \(\Phi_\alpha(t)\) is periodic we only need to evaluate it for \(t \in [0, T]\), and from \(\Phi_\alpha(t \in [0,T])\) we can directly evaluate \(\Phi_\alpha(t)\), \(\Psi_\alpha(t)\) and \(\Psi(t)\) for arbitrary large \(t\).
Floquet formalism in QuTiP¶
QuTiP provides a family of functions to calculate the Floquet modes and quasi energies, Floquet state decomposition, etc., given a time-dependent Hamiltonian on the callback format, list-string format and list-callback format (see, e.g., qutip.mesolve
for details).
Consider for example the case of a strongly driven two-level atom, described by the Hamiltonian
In QuTiP we can define this Hamiltonian as follows:
In [1]: delta = 0.2 * 2*np.pi; eps0 = 1.0 * 2*np.pi; A = 2.5 * 2*np.pi; omega = 1.0 * 2*np.pi
In [2]: H0 = - delta/2.0 * sigmax() - eps0/2.0 * sigmaz()
In [3]: H1 = A/2.0 * sigmaz()
In [4]: args = {'w': omega}
In [5]: H = [H0, [H1, 'sin(w * t)']]
The \(t=0\) Floquet modes corresponding to the Hamiltonian (5) can then be calculated using the qutip.floquet.floquet_modes
function, which returns lists containing the Floquet modes and the quasienergies
In [6]: T = 2*pi / omega
In [7]: f_modes_0, f_energies = floquet_modes(H, T, args)
In [8]: f_energies
Out[8]: array([-2.83131212, 2.83131212])
In [9]: f_modes_0